v1.2 depth expansion

Problem

The initial template catalog covers a shallow set of connectors and use cases — many popular data sources and common analytical patterns lack quickstart dashboards entirely. Users who adopt Dataface for one connector find no templates when they try to extend to others, limiting retention and expansion. Without data-driven prioritization of which templates to build next, the team risks investing in low-impact areas while high-demand gaps remain unfilled.

Context

• This milestone should deepen repeatable production, review, and publishing of quickstarts and example dashboards based on what users actually needed after the initial launch, not just what sounded interesting during planning.
• Expansion work is most valuable when it builds on stable foundations and clearly improves real workflows instead of reopening unresolved launch-quality debt.
• Expected touchpoints include examples/, review/publishing docs, production-line scripts, and dashboard content fixtures, usage feedback, and any launch metrics or review artifacts that indicate where extra depth would matter most.

Possible Solutions

• A - Add the next roadmap ideas opportunistically: keeps momentum, but it risks building depth in areas users do not care about.
• B - Recommended: expand the highest-value workflows using observed usage and retention signals: keep scope tied to concrete evidence and stable foundations.
• C - Avoid depth work until a larger redesign is planned: safer, but it leaves real user demand unanswered for too long.

Plan

1. Review post-launch usage, support, and feedback to identify where deeper investment in repeatable production, review, and publishing of quickstarts and example dashboards would most improve real workflows.
2. Define a focused expansion scope with explicit non-goals so new depth does not sprawl into adjacent or unproven ideas.
3. Implement or queue the selected enhancements along with the docs, QA, and migration notes needed to make them safe to adopt.
4. Measure whether the added depth changed user outcomes enough to justify further expansion in the same area.

Implementation Progress

Review Feedback

• [ ] Review cleared