M2 table formatting survey and option inventory
Problem
Research BI products and table libraries, then produce a normalized option inventory for column, row, and cell formatting and linking.
Context
- Dataface needs to know which table capabilities are table stakes versus product-specific stretch goals.
- The survey should normalize options across BI tools and table libraries rather than copy one product blindly.
- This inventory will feed the schema, docs, and implementation prioritization for M2 table work.
Possible Solutions
- A - Start designing the Dataface table API from internal intuition only: fast, but likely incomplete.
- B - Copy a single tools model and adapt later: efficient, but risks inheriting the wrong abstraction.
- C - Recommended: survey several relevant tools, normalize their option sets, and rank them by value, complexity, and fit for Dataface.
Plan
- Select the comparison set of BI products and table libraries to study.
- Extract and normalize their formatting, linking, and visual-encoding options.
- Rank options by importance, implementation cost, and architectural fit.
- Convert the survey into a decision input for the table schema and roadmap.
Implementation Progress
QA Exploration
- [ ] QA exploration completed (or N/A for non-UI tasks)
Review Feedback
- [ ] Review cleared