Prototype gaps and follow-on capture

Problem

Prototype validation has surfaced rough edges — tool schema ambiguities, missing error context, prompt patterns that produce unreliable results — but these gaps are not cataloged or prioritized. Without a written gap analysis, the transition from prototype to pilot will repeat the same failures. Key unknowns include whether the MCP tool contracts are stable enough for multi-step agent workflows, whether the evaluation approach can detect regressions, and what guardrails are missing to prevent agents from generating invalid YAML or running expensive queries without limits.

Context

Possible Solutions

Plan

Implementation Progress

Review Feedback

• [ ] Review cleared